Posts mit dem Label usa werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label usa werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Montag, 30. Mai 2022

Unriddling the Moon Rabbit

 

 

Perhaps you heard about Chinas lunar rover taking a picture of a geometric structure on the far side of the Moon [LINK]. It happened a couple of months ago and as the story goes they were eager to get their rover to the apparent anomaly as soon as possible, which according to them would mean no less than 3 months. 

 

The original image taken by the lunar rover Yutu 2.

Considering the fact that the rover moves at 0.2 km/h, and that the farthest distance on the Moons horizon is 2.46 km, then, even if it was traveling at half speed, and is as far away from the object as possible, it still would reach it in about 24 hours. 

When one also takes into account, that the resolution of the image could be likened to that of a webcam from the early 2000's it becomes apparent, that a blatant ruse of some kind was in the making.

One month (!) later, the Chinese space agency tells the world that they already reached the target (with no mention as to how fast they got there), and that it was merely an optical illusion, caused by... a rabbit shaped rock. [LINK]

In Chinese culture they imagine they see a rabbit in the moon instead of a human face as we do in the west. There's a Chinese proverb that goes "The Rabbit is the most wronged one.", and the word for injustice contains the character used for rabbit...

... so the question we should ask ourselves is, who's being wronged by whom?

Make what you want of this; but if you ask me it's beyond laughable. The rock is not even close to scale, and the resemblance to a rabbit is questionable at best. So what to make of all this? 

To make sense of this story a broader context is needed. Let's start with the supposition that the first picture, the blurry one, is in fact a genuine, albeit deliberately skewed, image of an artificial structure.

Assuming there's a bunch of those things up there* it should be safe to say that the US have had knowledge about their existence since at least the 70's when they started to send satellites with mapping technology there. This would also mean that the government has been part of a half-century old cover-up to hide this truth from the public; a truth that would most certainly cause some serious ruckus. 

"In 2004, a researcher named J.P. Skipper made some astonishing findings when scrutinizing the pictures taken during the US military (BMDO) project called Clementine. The picture above is just one of several in which one clearly can see tall objects blurred out." (read more here)

I would argue that China's intention with this stunt, was to give the US a three month dead line to give in to some demand; or else the cover up would be exposed. A few weeks later a compromise was reached, a random bs-photo was given to the public and the whole story was quickly forgotten.

Obviously governments negotiate and cut deals with each other all the time. And even if it's a loosely defined term, the "Deep State" - mainly consisting of intelligence agencies and financial & industrial power houses, who influence world affairs without the general public's direct knowledge - certainly exist, not only in America. 

In fact, I would be willing to bet that the great majority of geopolitical events, as they are being portrayed in mainstream media, in reality (also) happen for reasons undisclosed to the masses, by forces behind the curtains. 

The western media didn't pick it up much, but the fact of the matter is that Putin recently made a statement addressing an elusive western elite, with far reaching and ruthless influence.

[LINK]

To many this might seem like the ramblings of a mad man, but the fact of the matter is that he might as well be describing the doings of the wealthiest families in the States, just as Ferdinand Lundberg, Professor in social philosophy, lays it out in the meticulously well-researched The Rich and the Super Rich from 1968. 

With the help of an endless array of official documentation this 800 page epos makes the convincing case that those with the real power are in fact not individuals posing as philanthropists or politicians, but instead the unfathomably rich families which through (inherited) stakes and bonds control all the industries on a permanent basis - and thus also the political and judicial systems, which they in many instances have directly shaped. 

 

Professor Lundberg might not mention anything about exotic space crafts in his book, but he has a whole chapter on the Mellon's. A banker family who has been in the upper wealth-and-power echelon for well over a decade now. Now one member of this family, namely Christopher Mellon, did show up on CNN a couple of years ago, as front man for To The Stars Academy (sponsored by billionaire Robert Bigelow), talking about UFO's as a 'security threat'.

Christopher Mellon, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense and member of the Mellon family dynasty.

I wrote a piece (called The Sudden UFO Threat) on the media circus surrounding the UFO topic that suddenly surged between 2017 to mid 2021. Surely the purpose of the story (which recently came back on a lukewarm drowsy wave) was many fold: buffing up the defense budget and serving as a curious distraction from other events, to name a couple.

However the point can be convincingly made, that it indeed was a demonstration of top secret, highly advanced technology**, ready to be used if necessary, maybe in an attempt to steer China away from abandoning the dollar as world currency? We all know what happened to others (see: Libya) who tried the same thing.

 

I) The video shows a UFO flying over Kyiv about a week after the conflict between Ukraine and Russia started. II) The picture is a still from the infamous Tictac-UFO video shot by the marines. It does have some resemblance to the object in the video.

Just as the Chinese Lunar rover incident made little to no sense; the New York Times shining the spotlight on a b/w flying tictac video (bear in mind the NYT categorically ridiculed UFO's throughout its existence up until 2017), clearly was about something hidden to the public eye.

That we are dealing with a deep state covert cold war is certain. The notion that other worldly technology might be involved - at the very least - deserves consideration.

 

*That there exist many of them on our Moon's surface should be considered more likely than not to anyone who has looked into the matter thoroughly - I have written extensively about it in a previous post called Moonolith.

**In a diary entry from 1985, President Ronald Reagan wrote:

"[...]Lunch was with 5 top space scientists. It was fascinating. Space truly is the last frontier and some of the developments there in astronomy etc. are like science fiction except they are real. I learned that our shuttle capacity is such we could orbit 300 people.[...]" [LINK]

Officially humankind didn't have anything even remotely close to that kind of technology in the 80's, nevermind today. For more thoughts and testimonies on hyper exotic tech of the hidden kind check out my post The Implications of the UFO Phenomenon (II)








Samstag, 25. August 2018

Conspiracy Confirmed

conspiracy


[kuh n-spir-uh-see] 

nounplural conspiracies.
1.
the act of conspiring.
2.
an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secretby two or more persons; plot.
3.
a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose:
He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4.
Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud,or other wrongful act.
5.
any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result

Source: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/conspiracy

The defintion is very straight forward, yet the term is heavily associated with baseless and often delirious theorizing. It has even reached a point today, where questioning an established explanation can be shot down with the mere proclamation "Here comes the conspiracies ...".

If one studies history, one will find that this is an unfair belittling of the term. As a matter of fact conspiracies are common throughout the ages - our modern times not the least bit excluded.


Exempli gratia


The Russo-Swedish War. In the year 1788, during a time of lacking popularity, the Swedish king Gustav III thought that a war could boost his reputation. However, he was not permitted to declare war without the support of the estates, which, at the time, didn't like the idea. He therefore ordered a tailor in Stockholm to manufacture a handful of Russian military uniforms.

They were worn by Swedish agents who sneaked over the Swedish-Russian border and opened fire at an allied outpost. The incident caused sufficient outrage for Gustav III to declare war against the Russian Empire. Ironically Gustav III self became the victim of a conspiracy when he was assassinated by his own men in 1792. 

King Gustav III and General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff (1960-62), 
both keen on staging acts of terrorism on their own citizens.

230 years ago but far from the first or last time a staged attack were put into action. For a similar scenario we do not need to look far. Just a few decades ago, in 1962 to be precise, the U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff* and the head of CIA put their signature on a plan called Operation Northwoods.

The content (the original document can be found here) propose a series of false flag terrorist attacks on American soil, blamed on Cuban communists in order to provoke a war against the regime. Even though it had green light from both the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the CIA, President Kennedy refused to sign it and the plan was rejected.

But alas, not all shady operations had a happy ending. Here's a couple of examples of successful ones: In 1938 a group of German agents posing as polish extremists attacked a German radio station, in what is called the Gleiwitz incident, in order to give Germany an excuse to invade Poland.

In the Gulf of Tonkin incident, 1964, a non-happening was falsely reported as an unprovoked attack on American ships. Consequence? A fierce escalation of the Vietnam war.

In 1932, Japanese military detonated a small railway explosion, close to the Chinese city Mukden, just as a Japanese freight train passed. Even though the explosion barely scratched the train, Japan was quick to answer the self-provoked attack with invading troops. Read more about this false flag operation here.


Edward Snowden, internationally wanted for blowing the whistle on NSA's 
global and opaque surveillance program on the citizens of the world.

But a conspiracy can be more than a false-flag operation. Take the Snowden leaks for example: documents that confirmed the existence of a global, autonomous surveillance apparatus.

We also know for a fact that the US and Great Britain have been involved with both overthrowing and bellicose intermingling of foreign governments, the 1953 Iranian coup d'état and the 2003 Invasion of Iraq are two good examples. The actual number is way higher than two though, as this Washington Post article suggests.

Colin Powell in 2003, manipulating a world-wide audience to get support for the illegal invasion of Iraq. 
Here's a clip from a speech addressed to the UN security council.

Before moving on, here's a few more noteworthy cases of confirmed conspiring:

  • CIA involvement in contra drug trafficking
  • Operation Paperclip: After WW2 the U.S. gave over 1600 Germans, many of which had held top positions in the Nazi party, asylum. The motive was to get an upper hand against the Russians in the coming cold war. 
  • MK-Ultra: CIA's illegal mind control program, involving torture like experiments on innocent, often unknowing citizens. 
  • Thulegate: In contravention of Denmark's nuclear-free zone-policy, the government allowed the U.S. to store nuclear weapons on Greenland for decades. 
  • The 1990 Testimony of Nayirah: A staged testimony in front of the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, which got world wide attention by all major news outlets, and was used by president George H W Bush (among others) to back Kuwait in the Gulf War. 
  • Opreation Mockingbird: CIA's large scale program to infiltrate and manipulate mainstream media, involving as much as 400 bought journalists.

Wait a minute


This article was originally composed in 2015 in my Swedish blog, and when I started to translate it to English a year later it was just before Trump entered the White House. Alas, I wasn't nearly finished with the translation when everything took a very interesting turn. 

Before we knew it the term fake news dominated mainstream media, a term which the media power houses launched in order to undermine both alternative news sources as well as Trumps various proclamations. The plan quickly back fired when Trump started to use it against them.


A news story backed by FBI, CIA, NSA etc. broke in all major channels, claiming that Russian hackers had helped Trump win the presidential election. Trump's response was to call it unsubstantiated propaganda, or if you will fake news. 

No evidence was presented, so what we got was a word against word situation, where at least one of them had to be conspiring. Even if the term conspiracy per se wasn't seen much, the semantics of it had to be accepted by the general public as something happening today, on the grandest of scales.

***

Later it has turned out that Trump got help from the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, who apparently used the data of at least 50 million facebook users to help Trump win the election.


The firm apparently have taken part in manipulating the outcome of elections in e.g. Mexico, India, Malta and Kenya. In the clip, the former CEO mentions both sex workers and fake bribes as methods to influence politicians.

It is still unclear where the Russian hackers fit in.


What remains


History confirms that foul play is far from something unique, but rather that it has been common practice from the very beginning.

You have just been given over 15 major cases.

The question remains: what are they getting away with?


Relaterad bild